Monthly Archives: September 2013
Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process for user needs elicitation. A preliminary study on a device for auto-injection of epinephrine.
Abstract
Understanding user needs is essential to design biomedical devices that are efficacious in real life (clinically effective). Few studies propose analytic quantitative methods to elicit user needs. This paper presents a preliminary application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to elicit user needs. As a case study we focused on the use of a biomedical device for auto-injection of epinephrine to treat severe allergic reactions. Although the study presented is on-going, the methods we describe provide valuable insights into how quantitative methods can be applied to user needs elicitation.
Leandro Pecchia, Jennifer L Martin, Arthur G. Money, Julie Barnet
User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A case study on a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner.
Abstract
Background: The rigorous elicitation of user needs is a crucial step for both medical device design and purchasing.
However, user needs elicitation is often based on qualitative methods whose findings can be difficult to integrate
into medical decision-making. This paper describes the application of AHP to elicit user needs for a new CT scanner
for use in a public hospital.
Methods: AHP was used to design a hierarchy of 12 needs for a new CT scanner, grouped into 4 homogenous
categories, and to prepare a paper questionnaire to investigate the relative priorities of these. The questionnaire
was completed by 5 senior clinicians working in a variety of clinical specialisations and departments in the same
Italian public hospital.
Results: Although safety and performance were considered the most important issues, user needs changed
according to clinical scenario. For elective surgery, the five most important needs were: spatial resolution,
processing software, radiation dose, patient monitoring, and contrast medium. For emergency, the top five most
important needs were: patient monitoring, radiation dose, contrast medium control, speed run, spatial resolution.
Conclusions: AHP effectively supported user need elicitation, helping to develop an analytic and intelligible
framework of decision-making. User needs varied according to working scenario (elective versus emergency
medicine) more than clinical specialization. This method should be considered by practitioners involved in
decisions about new medical technology, whether that be during device design or before deciding whether to
allocate budgets for new medical devices according to clinical functions or according to hospital department.
Leandro Pecchia, Jennifer L Martin, Angela Ragozzino, Carmela Vanzanella, Arturo Scognamiglio,
Luciano Mirarchi and Stephen P Morgan
Result test
this is result test